Hat tip to corrente.
Posts Tagged ‘Labor’
Longshore Union Got a Raw Deal from AFL-CIO by Carl Finamore for Counterpunch.
Labor Leaders, Obamacare and the Fate of the Unions by Shamus Cooke for TruthOut.
I was disappointed that President Obama did not support a public opinion for health insurance, as he promised during the 2008 campaign. But for a long time I hoped that the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, would be an improvement, despite its flaws. I now think my hope was misplaced.
Many labor union members are turning against Obamacare, but AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka is trying to soften criticism because he is committed to supporting the Democratic Party. This is one of the reasons (not the only one) that the International Longshore and Warehouse Union decided to leave the AFL-CIO.
Larry Summers: Goldman Sacked by Greg Palast.
When Larry Summers was Deputy Secretary of the Treasury in the Clinton administration, one of his common questions was, “What would Goldman think of that?”—referring to Goldman Sachs, possibly the most predatory and dishonest of the Wall Street financial firms. Summers’ boss, then Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, came out of Goldman Sachs.
So it’s no wonder that there was a public outcry against his appointment as chair of the Federal Reserve Board, and that, as a result, he withdrew his name from consideration. The wonder is that President Obama considered him in the first place. In the article above, Greg Palast reviews Summers entire record of negative accomplishment.
Banks Are Manipulating Gold and Silver Markets by Washington’s Blog for The Big Picture.
A lot of people acquire gold and silver because they believe it has intrinsic value, unlike stocks and bonds. But writers for The Guardian and The Telegraph in London report that the prices of gold and silver are manipulated by the big banks and trading companies, just like interest rates.
The post provides a link to that article and links to other articles detailing just about every way the big financial firms rip off the public.
How Detroit went broke: The answers may surprise you—and don’t blame Coleman Young by the Detroit Free Press.
The Detroit Free Press ran a good article about the history of the Detroit city government’s financial mismanagement. But the key reason Detroit went broke is that the auto industry abandoned the city, and the city’s political and business leaders never developed a strategy for diversifying the city’s economy. Detroit’s location at the junction of two Great Lakes and a land bridge between the United States and Canada ought to give it some comparative economic advantage.
Defenders of sweatshop conditions in China say that low wages are the result of the impersonal workers of a hypothetical free market. But a recent study (links are below) shows the real cause is the structure of the supply chain linking components producers such as Foxconn to customers such as Apple Computer.
When I hire a painter to paint my house, and he hires a helper, the free market works the way it ought to work because there is a rough equality of buying power. But no such equality exists when individual workers are dealing not just with corporations, but with networks of corporations.
The corporate supply chain represents a concentration of power and a diffusion of responsibility. When workers try to negotiate with Foxconn, managers can say that there is as limit to what they can do based on Apple’s requirements. But Apple managers have no direct responsibility. They can say there is a limit to what they can do based on their fiduciary responsibility to maximize return to stockholders.
You could say government should step in and set minimum wages and labor standards, but at the present time the governments of China and the USA are aligned with management, not workers. Governments will not heed workers until they organize and create a base of power that governments must heed. The workers of the world should unite.
Click on A Suicide Survivor: The Life of a Chinese Migrant Worker at Foxconn for a picture of working conditions at Foxconn by Jenny Chan.
Click on The politics of global production: Apple, Foxconn and China’s new working class for the text of the study by Jenny Chan, Ngai Punan and Mark Selden for their full paper.
Click on Apple et al create new working class for a duplicate copy of the study in Asia Times. This is where I first came across the study.
I think workers will always need to organize to protect their own interests. Labor unions are a structure that exists for that purpose, but it is nothing more than a structure, just as a corporation, a government agency, a charitable organization or a church is a structure. The people within the structure may or may not be faithful to carrying out the organization’s purpose.
Labor unions are much more democratic and much less corrupt than other institutions in American society, partly because corruption is much less tolerated in unions than in other institutions. Corrupt labor leaders go to prison; corrupt bankers retire to enjoy their ill-gotten gains. Under law, the government can, and has, appointed trustees to take over corrupt labor unions and clean house. Nothing of the sort exists for labor unions.
I think there always will be a need for labor unions, but future labor unions may not be like those of the present day. In the 1930s, the American Federation of Labor, consisting predominantly of skilled workers organized by craft, did not respond to the discontent of workers in great industries. Workers acted on their own, and the CIO (Committee for Industrial Organization, later Congress of Industrial Organizations) was formed in response.
The Wagner Act of 1935 recognized the right of unions to exist and to make contracts through collective bargaining, but imposed on them the obligation not to strike for the duration of the contract. Further restrictions on labor unions were imposed by the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 and the Landrum-Griffin Act of 1959.
The one-day work stoppages by Wal-Mart and fast-food workers remind me of what I read about the history of the 1930s, with workers taking their fate into their own hands and the recognized labor unions rushing to keep up with them. These actions could represent a new direction for American workers. I hope they do.
Our Sad, Misunderstood Labor Unions by David Macaray for Counterpunch.
Labor unions are the only organizations whose purpose is to defend the rights of working people. Why, then, have they gotten such a bad name?
Reversing the Labor Movement’s Free Fall by Stanley Aronowitz in Logos.
Aronowitz argues that labor unions must go beyond collective bargaining and champion the interests of working people across the board.
The AFL-CIO’s New Strategy by Shamus Cooke for Counterpunch.
While the AFL-CIO leadership recognizes the need for new strategy and tactics, it is limited by its commitment to the Democratic Party and the anti-union Obama administration.
Productivity Rose 7.7 Percent Post-Recession; Workers Have Seen None of It by David Dayen for Naked Capitalism.
The decline of labor unions is turning the United States into a low-wage nation.
Workers Greatest Power Over Owners and Bosses? The Ability to Stop Work and Walk Out by James Cersonski for AlterNet.
Largest fast food strike ever: 58 cities will be affected by Joseph Eidelson for Salon.
Workers in the fast-food industry use strikes to protest unfair treatment and low wages rather than waiting until they can negotiate contracts.
Fast Food, Retail Worker Strikes Do Honor to King Legacy by David Dayen for Naked Capitalism.
Martin Luther King’s 1963 speech was given for the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, and he was murdered while in Memphis, Tenn., to support a strike by municipal garbage collectors. If he were alive, he would support union organizers of low-wage workers and strikers against low-wage companies.
Five reasons for optimism about labor unions this Labor Day by John Logan for The Hill.
Here are links to articles I found interesting and you might find interesting, too.
On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs by David Graeber for Britain’s Strike! magazine.
Some 80 years ago the great economist John Maynard Keynes predicted that advances in technology would make it possible to do all the necessary work of society without people having to work long hours at low pay.
David Graeber said that this, in fact, has happened, but the necessary work of society is being crowded out by unnecessary work. He knows people who say frankly that their work serves no useful purpose, and they do it only to earn an income.
How do you distinguish between necessary and unnecessary work? Simply imagine what would happen if all the people doing a particular job went on strike? Society would be seriously inconvenienced if nobody taught school or staffed fast-food restaurants. But if all tele-marketers ceased work, most people would be glad.
Graeber wrote that it is the people who are doing the meaningful work—teachers, factory workers, health care workers—who are under attack in the current economic struggle, and that they are targets of resentment by people trapped in meaningless work. This is a good instrument of social control, he thinks.
An Open Letter to President Barack Obama by Ani McHugh, a high school English teacher in New Jersey.
Ani McHugh appealed to President Obama to abandon corporate school “reform” which, she says, prevents teachers from doing their jobs. She would be an example of people with meaningful and important jobs who are under attack.
How to Become a Part-Time Worker Without Really Trying by Barbara Garson for TomDispatch.
The trend to part-time work is not just a result of fewer factories and more fast-food restaurants. Barbara Garson described how companies are switching from full-time to part-time work, with the same work requiring the same skills and sometimes by the same people, but with less pay, fewer benefits and no job security.
Walmart has been given $4 million in financial incentives by the city of Darien, Conn., to convert its store there into a Super Walmart.
The usual justification for tax abatements and other subisidies for new industry is that they create local jobs. But, as Kathleen Geier of The Washington Monthly wrote in a recent Salon article, there is no evidence of any net economic benefit to a Walmart moving in.
What Walmart does is to put local mom-and-pop stores out of business. Some studies indicate that Walmart kills more jobs than it creates; others that it is a standoff.
Sam Walton, the founder of Walmart, was an innovator whose just-in-time system of inventory management reduced costs and enabled his company to reduce prices. But now the company’s strategy for reducing prices is to use its market power to hold down wages and the prices it pays suppliers. This does not benefit the areas the stores serve.
It is not just Walmart. I think it is a mistake for any local government to offer subsidies for a new business to come in and compete with existing businesses. I say let the businesses compete on a level playing field.
I’ll go further. If it were up to me, the only business subsidy by American local governments would be free job training.
American businesses complain of lack of skills by new hires, but say they can’t provide training because there’s no way to stop the employees from taking their upgraded skills elsewhere. Very well. Let community colleges take over the responsibility for job training.
This is a form of aid that does not discriminate between existing business and new business. It is not something the business owners can pocket and move elsewhere. It creates value which benefits the people of the community and stays in the community.
Click on Wal-mart’s big lie: No, it doesn’t create jobs for Kathleen Geier’s complete article in Salon.