The slippery steps from words to war

Eric Martin, a contributor to the Democracy Arsenal web log, wrote a post about two years ago outlining six slippery steps that take the United States into military quagmires.

Step 1:  How can the President not at least condemn [Regime X] publicly for its abhorrent actions?  A public condemnation is the very least the President can do.  It wouldn’t cost much, but it would be an important show of our resolve and support for freedom!

Step 2 (with Regime X still in place):  So what, the President condemned the regime publicly with some harsh words and called it “illegitimate.”  Words are cheap and inconsequential.  We need sanctions and coordinated efforts to isolate the regime.  That will do the trick!

a308_marines_kandahar_2050081722-12811Step 3 (with Regime X still in place):  Sanctions?  Regime isolation?  Is that all the President is going to do in the face of Regime X’s perfidy?  Those timid jabs will never work, and the President’s dithering will make us look weak and lacking in resolve.  Our enemies will be emboldened.  The President must use our military to deal a swift blow.  No one is advocating a prolonged occupation, just a decapitation maneuver, and then a rapid hand off to the indigenous forces for democratic change.

Step 4 (with Regime X toppled by our military):  Now that we’ve committed our military, and brought about regime change, we have a moral obligation to see the mission through to the end.  Besides, if we withdraw, chaos will erupt and our enemies will fill the vacuum.  We owe it to the locals, we can’t afford to lose face, we can’t show weakness and our credibility depends on staying until a relatively stable, friendly nation emerges from the rubble.

Step 5 (repeat as needed):  We’ve turned the corner, shifted the momentum and victory is within reach.  The next six months should prove decisive.

Step 6:  I was critical of the handling of this military action from the beginning.  I would have conducted the operation differently.  Regardless, no one ever said it would be quick or easy.  But the difficulties encountered don’t discredit the policy!

Click on On Rhetoric and Regime Change to read Martin’s full post.  Hat tip to James Fallows.

[Update 9/6/13]  I added a clip to the top of this post from a forthcoming documentary film on Donald Rumsfeld, showing how easy and reasonable it seemed to go from Step 2 to Step 3 in regard to Saddam’s Iraq.  Each step seems reasonable in itself, but they take you to a place you don’t want to go.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: