If not for NAFTA, the United States probably wouldn’t have the issue it does with unauthorized immigration from Mexico.
The North American Free Trade Agreement, enacted in 1993, was part of a strategy by the Bill Clinton administration, continuing the policy of previous administrations, to increase U.S. exports.
NAFTA, although it eliminated government subsidies for many products, preserved U.S. subsidies for corn and dairy products. The corn subsidy was also in effect a subsidy for meat, since meat animals are fed subsidized corn.
Small Mexican farmers, especially corn farmers, could not compete against the cheap food imports that flooded into Mexico. Many left the land, and joined the migrant stream into the United States.
U.S. government policy was successful in increasing exports of corn. The unintended result was increased imports of unauthorized workers. I think NAFTA should be amended or repealed, but, sadly, this will not change the results of NAFTA.
Under Nafta, Mexico Suffered and the United States felt its pain by Laura Carlsen for the New York Times.
Corn Sales to Western Hemisphere Surge by the National Corn Growers Association.
NAFTA and US farmers—20 years later by Karen Hansen-Kuhn for the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.
Mexican Farmers Affected by Agricultural Subsidies from NAFTA, Other International Agreements by Susana G. Baumann for the Huffington Post.
Corn Subsidies at Root of U.S.-Mexico Immigration Problems by Anthony B. Bradley of the Acton Institute.
How U.S. Policies Fueled Mexico’s Great Migration by David Bacon for The Nation.
Free trade: As U.S. corn flows south, Mexicans stop farming by Tim Johnson for McClatchy Newspapers.