The selective revelations of the Panama Papers

Update 4/10/2016.  In fact some Americans are named in the Panama Papers documents.  And rich Americans and American corporations have ways to hide their wealth without going abroad.  There’s more in the links below.

Trillions of dollars—an enormous fraction of the world’s wealth—is concealed in secret accounts outside the jurisdiction of the nations of which the owners are citizensIt is invisible and inaccessible to criminal investigators, tax collectors, bill collectors and divorcing spouses.

Now the world has a glimpse of some of those secret accounts, thanks to a leak of documents from a Panamanian law firm, Mossack Fonseca, to a German daily newspaper, Sueddeutsche Zeitung.  Mossack Fonseca specializes in registering corporations in tax havens.  The leaked documents had information on more than 214,000 companies and 140 world leaders.

The staff of Sueddeutsche Zeitung and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists spent a year sifting through the leaked documents, and shared their information with other news organizations.

blog_panama_papers_countries

Interestingly few if any of the leaked documents implicated Americans or American corporations.  Maybe Americans don’t happen to use Mossack Fonseca to register their companies.  Or maybe there is more information yet to be revealed.  Or maybe somebody had a hidden agenda.

.

.

When I worked as a newspaper reporter, I sometimes had tips or leaks from people with ulterior motives.  That didn’t deter me so long as the tips or leaks led to true information.  I was aware, though, that what I was being steered to see might not be the whole story, and that it was important to think about whose axe was being ground.

Whatever the motive of the leaker in this case, tax havens are a serious problem.  They also are a fairly easy problem to fix, if governments had the will to do so.  Many are in territories under the direct jurisdiction of the British government.  And, as Kevin Drum pointed out, the United States could easily refuse access to U.S. banks to shell companies in known tax havens.

LINKS

Panama Papers: Secrets of Dirty Money by the staff of Sueddeutsche Zeitung.

The Panama Papers: Politicians, Criminals and the Rogue Industry That Hides Their Cash by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.

Massive leak exposes how wealthy and powerful hide their money by Kevin G. Hall and Marisa Taylor for McClatchy newspapers.

Corporate Media Gatekeepers Protect Western 1% From Panama Leak by Craig Murray.

Why Critic Craig Murray Needs the Scorecard Before He Can Name the Players by Richard Smith for naked capitalism. [added 4/6/2016]

200 people in the U.S. exposed for using tax havens in Panama by David Smith for The Guardian [added 4/6/2016]

The World’s Largest Tax Haven Is the United States by Jesse Drucker for Bloomberg News.  [added 4/8/2016]

Co-Founder of Mossack Fonseca Defends Law Firm at Center of ‘Panama Papers’, an interview with the Wall Street Journal.  [added 4/9/2016]

Questioning the Picture Painted in the WSJ’s Interview with Jürgen Mossack by Richard Smith for naked capitalism. [added 4/9/2016]

Americans Named in Panama Papers Leak, an interview of McClatchy Newspapers’ Tim Johnson on the Real News Network.  [added 4/10/2016]

Global Tax Haven Network Means Americans Can Hide Their Wealth at Home, an interview of investigative economist James S. Henry on the Real News Network.  [added 4/10/2016]

Tags: , , , , ,

2 Responses to “The selective revelations of the Panama Papers”

  1. sglover Says:

    But the people and governments affected or implicated straddle a pretty broad range, don’t you think? For instance, Putin **and** Poroshenko? The Icelandic PM? Cameron? I mean, maybe there’s an insidious agenda behind the revelations so far, but it’s hard to figure the connecting thread.

    Isn’t it early days yet? It’s an enormous document haul, I expect that it’ll be spawning headlines for the next year at least. And I’m very interested to see which American “leaders” turn up.

    If the Panama Papers had been leaked to the NYT or the WaPo, then certainly it would be sensible to wonder about hidden agendas. As far as I can tell, the only reason to read those rags is to see what the Inner Party thinks we should fret about. But over the last several years I’ve been relying on the English language news from Deutsche Welle and Der Spiegel. I’ve found them consistently more informative and reliable than any of the major news outfits in the Anglosphere — often even in their coverage of American news. So I’m inclined to believe that German news organizations still have standards, and that the involvement of the Sueddeutsche Zeitung is a hopeful sign.

    Like

  2. Lisa the Infidel Says:

    Reblogged this on The way I see things … and commented:
    When I worked as a newspaper reporter, I sometimes had tips or leaks from people with ulterior motives. That didn’t deter me so long as the tips or leaks led to true information. I was aware, though, that what I was being steered to see might not be the whole story, and that it was important to think about whose axe was being ground.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: