The best way to sift the Trump-Russia allegations

The best way to deal with the suspicions and charges that the Trump election campaign colluded with Russians is to appoint a bi-partisan commission of respected individuals to investigate.

This commission should have full authority to read secret transcripts collected by U.S. intelligence agencies and any other classified information relevant to the case, and authority to publish such information as can be done with jeopardizing sources and agents.

It should have full authority to subpoena witnesses and require  testimony under penalty of perjury.

It is a federal crime for a foreign national to contribute to a candidate in a U.S. election, or for anyone to solicit or accept such a contribution.   This would most definitely include the contribution of secret intelligence information.

If a Presidential candidate knowingly accept foreign help, I would say it is an impeachable offense.

The charter of the bi-partisan commission should be to determine whether there is any evidence that the Trump administration violated federal election law.

Evidence would include transcripts of communications of Russian agents and testimony by Americans regarding secret meetings of Trump operatives and Russian agents, or documents and records in the Trump campaign acknowledging Russian help, or testimony of Trump campaign operatives.

Routine contacts between Trump supporters and Russian diplomats or business people, especially if in public or in front of witnesses, would not be evidence of violation of election laws.

Even past business relationships of Trump operatives or even Trump himself with corrupt Russian oligarchs or business operations would not be such evidence—although very interesting to know.

I think it important that such an investigation be carried out by respected individuals in a bipartisan commission, and not by a special prosecutor who would consider himself or herself a failure if they didn’t find grounds to indict somebody.

I would be very surprised if such a commission came up with an impeachable offense.

I think there is a strong possibility, although no proof, that Russians were behind the leaks of the Clinton and DNC e-mails to Wikileaks.   But if I were a Russian and did something like this, I would make sure not to have any contact with the Trump campaign, or anybody who had contract with the Trump campaign.

But you never know.  One of my life lessons is never to say, “So-and-so would never do such-and-such because it wouldn’t make sense.”  In 1972, it didn’t make sense to me that President Nixon would order a burglary of DNC offices at the Watergate hotel, but he did.

An investigation—an impartial investigation—is needed.


Foreign Contributions to U.S. Elections by the University of Kentucky Election Law Society.   Also the Foreign Nationals Brochure of the Federal Election Commission.

Russia: The Conspiracy Trap by Masha Gessen for The New York Review of Books.

Russia doves should demand an investigation by Noah Millman for The Week  [Added 3/8/2017].

The Trump Investigation: Essential Criminal Probe or Politically Motivated Witch Hunt? by Mike Whitney for Counterpunch  [Added 3/8/2017].:

Illustration via

Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: