
Image via Soviet Men: the People’s Blog.
Research into artificial intelligence has created something that is either (1) in some sense, a super intelligent sentient being, or (2) an imitation of a sentient being that is so good that it is impossible to tell the difference.
An AI known as ChatGPT-3 has taught itself to write poetry and computer code even though not specifically programmed to do so. It expresses emotion and makes moral judgments of users.
I’ve provided samples in previous posts. So has “Nikolai Vladivostok,” in a post I highly recommend reading.
Is the new AI just a version of auto-correct, with capabilities raised many, many orders of magnitude? Or is it actually alive, under some definition of “alive”?
Whichever it is, something strange and powerful is being created that we the human race don’t understand and can’t fully control, and yet we are racing to find ways to make it more powerful and embed it in our society.
Some people fear an all-powerful AI awakening and deciding to dispense with the human race. Others fear the “paperclip apocalypse,” that a super intelligent AI is given a mission, such as making paperclips, and it runs amok and turns the whole world into paperclips.
I don’t have the knowledge to judge the likelihood of these particular threats. I’m just saying that, as a matter of common sense, it is unwise to entrust key functions of society to entities we don’t understand and to let loose forces we may not be able to control.
A wise society would call a temporary halt to AI development until we can assess what we have got, then proceed cautiously step-by-step, if at all. Yet there is no mechanism for doing this.
If a researcher holds back from enhancing AI, some other researcher will get ahead of him. If a business, army, espionage organization, advertising agency, etc., holds back from using AI, a rival business, army, espionage organization, advertising agency, etc. will get ahead of it.
It is the age-old dilemma of the arms race – bad for all of us collectively, yet dangerous individually to refuse to join in.

Source: U.S. Copyright Office.