Some white people think they are victims of racial discrimination. They object to a Black Congressional Caucus, a United Negro College Fund or a National Association for the Advancement of Colored People on the grounds that any distinction based on race is, by definition, racist, just as a white congressional caucus or a united Caucasian college fund would be.
I doubt, however, that very many of the people who raise this objection would be willing to change places with black people, and be treated as black people still are treated in American society.
I have heard of black people passing for white, but I never heard of any white person passing for black. (I am not talking about people like the white firefighter years ago who claimed he was an affirmative action hire because he had a native American grandmother.)
The experience of black and white testers – equally qualified black and white people who apply for apartment rents, mortgage loans or jobs – shows that black Americans are not playing on a level playing field. So long as black people are singled out for discrimination on the basis of race, they have a need and a right to organize on the basis of race.
The other relevant distinction is that the descendants of black American slaves are an ethnic and cultural group as well as a racial group. Out of their experience, have created a distinctive music, art and literature as well as movements for social reform. The black experience has significance for everyone, not just for black people. If you interpret American history as a history of the struggle for freedom, African-American history is a prime example and central part of that struggle.
African-Americans as an ethnic group are comparable not to white people as a whole, but to particular groups such as New England Yankees, Polish-Americans, Appalachian mountaineers or American Jews. We white Americans have nothing in common that we do not share with Americans of all colors, except for the history of white racism. I am not one of those who says that American history and European history as a whole constitute White Studies, because that implies these subjects are not of equal interest to members of all ethnic groups, but certainly the contributions of Anglo white males are not ignored.
So it is not discriminatory to have African-Americans studies programs in universities and not European-American studies or white studies. When I attended the University of Wisconsin in the 1950s, there was a Department of Scandinavian Studies. I heard that a liberal arts college in the Rochester area is thinking about starting an Irish Studies program. These would be the true parallels to African-American studies programs.