Democrats in the U.S., the Labor Party in Britain and left-wing parties in France no longer primarily represent the interests of wage earners, according to Thomas Piketty, the famous French economist.
Instead they represent an educated elite, which he calls the Brahmin left, while the conservative parties represent a financial elite, which he calls the merchant right.
The educated elite are not an intellectual elite. Having advanced college degrees don’t make you an intellectual any more than owning stocks and bonds makes you an entrepreneur.
I agree that there is less conflict of interest between the educated elite and the financial elite than there is between the two elites and the majority of wage-earners.
In a typical Fortune 500 corporation, the CEO, the board of directors and the institutional stockholders would be the merchant right.
Salaried middle management, the highly-paid consultants and most especially the human resources department would be the Brahmin left. Their income would not come from financial assets, but from their rank in an organization, for which they would qualify by means of educational credentials.
The human resources department of an organization usually determines the organizational culture. Typically HR people are big on diversity training and being LGBTQ allies because these things do not affect the wealth of stockholders or the power of top management.
American non-profit organizations such as universities and hospitals and also government agencies are adopting a corporate model.
This means a well-paid top-heavy administrative overhead along with lower pay, higher demands and less security for those who do actual work. Adjunct teachers, hospital nurses and letter carriers are treated just the same as factory workers.
Just to be clear, I’m in favor of sticking up for the rights of minorities, women and other groups that are targets of prejudice. What’s wrong is using this as cover for lower wages, longer hours, expansion of contingent work and a fight against labor unions.
Such are my observations about American institutional life. I don’t know how true these observations are true of institutions in Britain and France, or whether they are true at all, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they were.