One good example of political correctness in action is how the right to gay marriage in the United States has become an
I have no quarrel with the right gay marriage. It makes our nation more inclusive. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg. I’m glad that gays are no longer a persecuted minority, essentially outside the protection of the law.
I do have a problem with
unquestioned orthodoxies that shut down debate. A case in point was the firing of Brendan Eich as CEO of Mozilla Firefox last year.
But somebody dug up the fact that, in 2008, he had contributed $1,000 to Proposition 8, the California referendum to ban gay marriage. A few days after being named CEO, he was ousted.
Now he’s a rich and talented person who should be able to do all right for himself, so I don’t think this is the worst thing that ever happened to anyone. As Kathleen Geier pointed out, people in more precarious positions than Eich are fired every day for much more arbitrary reasons, including wearing a necktie the employer didn’t like.
My interest in the case is in the arguments given to justify his firing. His views were offensive to most people in Silicon Valley. Does that mean it would be okay for a company headquartered in, say, Utah to fire a CEO for supporting gay marriage?
Gay employees would feel uncomfortable working for a CEO who opposed their right to marry. This is the flip side of the argument most commonly used against gay rights.
The right of openly gay people to serve in the U.S. military was opposed on the grounds that straight troops would feel uncomfortable. And this, arguably, would be a more important consideration on the battlefield than in an office in California.
In an earlier era, this was a common argument against hiring African-Americans. Business owners told me that they had no objection to hiring qualified black people, but their customers wouldn’t feel comfortable with it.
Brendan Eich has a right to express his opinion, but he does not have a right to be free from the consequences of expressing his opinion. Would you apply this reasoning to, say, Hollywood screenwriters who were blacklisted during the McCarthy era?