Harvard historian Niall Ferguson uses this chart to explain why Americans are unhappy with their nation’s economy.
Last week Clinton’s supporters seized on new economic data showing that median household income rose by more than 5 percent in real terms last year. Poverty is down. So is the number of Americans without health insurance. So is unemployment. Yes, Hillary Clinton has had a few bad weeks. But don’t worry.
All this seems like grist to the mill of a campaign that essentially promises continuity. Yet there is a problem. Take another look at those figures for inflation-adjusted median household income. Yes, it was $56,500 last year, up from $53,700 the year before. But back in 1999 it was $57,909. In other words, it’s been a round trip — and a very bumpy one indeed — since Clinton’s husband was in the White House.
Telling Americans that they are nearly back to where they were 17 years ago and then expecting them to be grateful looks like a losing strategy. When two thirds of Americans — and even higher percentage of older white voters — say the country is on the wrong track, they are not (as Democrats claim) in denial about the Obama administration’s achievements.
They are saying that the country is on a circular track, and has been since this century began.
Source: Niall Ferguson | The Boston Globe
Hat tip to occasional links & commentary.