The Green New Deal resolution of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Edward Markey is more radical and far-reaching than Franklin D. Roosevelt’s original New Deal.
The non-binding resolution calls for a mass mobilization of American government and society against catastrophic climate change, on a scale as great or even greater than mobilization to fight World War Two.
The mobilization Ocasio-Cortez and Markey call for would mean a closing down or drastic shrinkage of industries that depend on fossil fuels. This would be a threat not only to the profits of powerful vested interests, but to the livelihoods of millions of good, hard-working people.
That is why the Green New Deal is also a deal. It includes social reform and a job creation program to get buy-in from working people and minorities, who might otherwise
There are two problems with the resolution. One is that it is too radical to gain political acceptance anytime soon. The other is that, radical as it is, its proposals may not be enough to deal with the crisis.
∞∞∞
If you read my previous post or the text of the resolution, you’ll see that it is largely a wish list of the environmental and labor movements for the past 20 or so years. Getting these movements on the same page would be a big accomplishment, because they haven’t always been friends.
The environmental movement has sometimes worked to the benefit of the well-to-do, such as subsidies for electric cars and solar panels, while putting the burden of change on the less-well-off, with higher gasoline and fuel prices. The labor movement has sometimes accepted the argument that it is necessary to sacrifice health, safety and the environment just to protect jobs.
Working people have good reason to be suspicious of promises that, if they give up what they have, they’ll be given something else just as good or better. This was the promise of NAFTA and the other trade agreements under the Clinton administration and after—that the loss of grungy industrial jobs will be offset by new bright, shiny high-tech jobs. This didn’t happen.
An expression that occurs repeatedly in the resolution is “vulnerable and frontline communities.” This refers to the communities left behind by de-industrialization and globalization during the past 30 years. It also refers to the communities that will bear the brunt of climate change—usually poorer, often minorities, such as the people left stranded in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrine. The resolution promises they won’t be left behind this time.