SILENT COVENANTS: Brown v. Board of Education and the Unfulfilled Hopes for Racial Reform by Derrick Bell (2004)
When I was a wet-behind-the-ears college liberal, I thought the 1954 Supreme Court decision outlawing segregation meant the slow-but-sure end of racism in the USA.
I thought then that simply getting black-and-white children together in the same room day after day would make them recognize their common humanity and bring an end to racial prejudice.
In hindsight, I see how naive that was. But I wasn’t alone. The late Derrick Bell, who later became one of the founders of critical race studies, thought the same thing at the time.
His book, Silent Covenants, is about why he changed his mind. I read it as part of a personal project to understand critical race theory from the viewpoint of its proponents.
As a lawyer for the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division and for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, he pursued many lawsuits based on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision that racially segregated schools are unconstitutional.
But later, after he joined the Harvard Law School faculty, he came to believe he was pursuing a false goal.
He said the desegregation decision was based on a false choice between, on the one hand, sending black children to schools that were separate and inferior and, on the other, on the other, sending them to schools where they were unwanted and in the minority.
Desegregation, when it was implemented, was typically carried out by closing black schools, some of which provided excellent educations and were greatly beloved by students and graduates.
Desegregation resulted in job losses by black teachers and principals, many of them outstanding educators.
Some 50 years later, Bell wrote, American public schools are still segregated, in practice if not by law, and the educational achievement gap between blacks and whites is as great as it ever was.
The great mistake of the Brown v. Board of Education decision decision, he wrote, was to pretend that the Constitution is color-blind.
Racism is baked into the structure of American society and the consciousness of white Americans, he wrote; this will never change.
Any apparent progress made by black Americans is the result of a temporary convergence of their needs and the agenda of some group of white people.
Slavery was abolished in Northern states because white workers there did not want to complete with slave labor. Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as a last-ditch effort to preserve the Union. The 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution were intended to foster Republican political dominance of the South.
When limited civil rights for black people ceased to serve the interests of powerful white people, those rights were wiped off the backboard, Bell wrote.
Judges in the 19th and early 20th centuries held that racism was a fact, which was not created by law and could not be abolished by law, but which the law had to accommodate.
Why, then, did the Supreme Court in 1954 suddenly decide that the Constitution was colorblind?