Paul Revere was much more than the man who rode to warn the troops at Lexington and Concord that the British were on their way.
He was a true revolutionary whose methods in some ways resemble revolutionaries and insurgents of todays. He was one of the most important leaders in a network of revolutionary organizations that engaged in propaganda, espionage and preparation for armed revolt.
He helped bring Britain’s Massachusetts colony to the tipping point of armed revolt, the battles of Lexington and Concord in 1775, and make that revolt successful.
PAUL REVERE’S RIDE by David Hackett Fischer (1994) tells the true story of Paul Revere as part of a detailed account of the events leading up to Lexington and Concord and an hour-by-hour account of what happened on that fateful day.
In giving a granular factual account of what happened on a particular day, Fischer threw light on many things—including manners, morals and day-to-day life in 1775 Massachusetts, how American and British political and social values differed, and how this was reflected in their respective military tactics.
In 1774-1775 Britain, you could be an artisan or mechanic who worked with his hands, a merchant who handled money or a gentleman who owned land and had a title of nobility, but you couldn’t combine these roles.
Paul Revere was all three. He was a silversmith who worked with his hands, and whose work is still prized today. He was a respected merchant. And he claimed and was given the status of gentleman.
Revere’s opposite number was General Thomas Gage, commander of British forces in North American and royal governor of Massachusetts. Gage believed his power derived from the King who ruled by divine right, but subject to British laws. The British believed they were a free people because of the principle of the rule of law.
A contrary principle had grown in up colonial New England. The Puritan churches, both in England and New England, were governed by their congregations. The New England townships were governed by town meetings. The principle was that authority in government came from the bottom up, not the top down.
General Gage’s mission was to make the people of New England submit to the authority of the British crown in some way, however minor or symbolic. At least seven organizations sprung up to resist this. There was no overall leader and nobody who belonged to all seven. Paul Revere and another leader, Dr. Joseph Warren, belonged to five.
Out in the countryside, each town had is own well-ordered militia, based on the right and duty of the citizen to keep and bear arms. Some towns provided weapons for the indigent.
There was no overall organization, only a communication network. Paul Revere organized teams of riders who kept the nearby towns informed of British plans. He made many rides himself.
Gage never ordered the arrests of Paul Revere, Dr. Joseph Warren, Sam Adams, John Hancock or any of the other revolutionary organizers, because they had not broken any specific law. He was later criticized for this.
Because of the broad-based nature of the organizations, any leaders would have been quickly replaced. Would new leaders have been as effective as the old? Would this have mattered? There is no way to know.
