A Palestinian history of Zionism and its wars

THE HUNDRED YEARS’ WAR ON PALESTINE: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917-2017 by Rashid Khalidi (2020)

Palestinian scholar Rashid Khalidi, a member of the faculty of Columbia University, has written a history of Zionism from the point of view of the Palestinians, a view that we in the USA rarely if ever hear.  

He is a member of an old Palestinian family, with roots going back into the Ottoman Empire, and his history is, in part, a history of his own family.  I emphasize the personal history in this post, although he himself mentions it only in passing. 

We in the USA are told that Israel’s history is a story of a heroic struggle by Zionists against Arab terrorists to establish a safe haven for Jews from Nazis and other antisemites. Alternatively, we are told it is a history of a tragic unavoidable conflict between two peoples, Jews and Palestinians, with equal claims to the same territory.

Rashid Khalidi said neither story is true.  He said the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is an ongoing colonial war waged by an indigenous people against conquerors from afar.  In his story, the Jewish settlers of Israel are equivalent to the Dutch and English settlers in South Africa and the French settlers in Algeria.

Zionists were never underdogs, he wrote.  They had the backing of the British Empire and then of the United States, as well as a powerful global network of supporters and donors.  

Palestinian Arabs never had anything equivalent, he wrote.  Even Arab governments that gave them lip service always had their own agendas.

His book is organized around six specific historical episodes, which he called “declarations of war” against the Palestinian people.     

∞∞∞

Introduction. The story begins in 1889 with Yusuf Diya ad-Din Pasha al-Khalidi, mayor of Jerusalem and the author’s great-great-uncle, writing a letter to Theodor Herzl, one of the founders of Zionism, telling him that Palestine is already inhabited and not open to colonization.  Herzl brushed off Yusuf Diya’s concerns, but, as Khalidi reveals, he was drawing up plans to push the Palestinian Arab population off their land.

Chap. 1.  The First Declaration of War, 1917-1939.  The Balfour Declaration of 1917 announced the British Empire’s support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people,” with the proviso that the rights of the non-Jewish population be recognized.  

The League of Nations empowered Britain to rule a Palestine Mandate on former territory of the Ottoman Empire. The Jewish Agency for Palestine was officially recognized as a quasi-governmental representative of the Jewish minority.  Internal documents show the British expected the Palestine Mandate to become a Jewish state. No governmental document as much as made reference to Arabs or Palestinians or their rights.  

In the late 1930s, there was a spontaneous uprising of Palestinian Arab population against the British.  Sir John Dill, commander of the British forces, asked the advice of Husayn al-Khalidi, the author’s uncle, who was the current mayor of Jerusalem.  

The mayor advised restricting Jewish immigration.  Dill disregarded this advice and crushed the rebellion with great brutality.  An estimated 14 to 17 percent of adult male Palestinian Arabs were killed, and al-Khalidi was arrested and sent into exile.

Chap. 2. The Second Declaration of War, 1947-1948.  By the end of the Second World War, much had changed.  The British had tried to appease the Arabs by restricting Jewish immigration.  Jewish refugees had forced their way into the Palestine Mandate territory (which I from now on will call the Holy Land) anyway.  

Rashid Khalidi

Bloody conflict broke out between Arabs and Jews.  The United States promoted passage of a United Nations partition resolution, which approved establishment of a Jewish state on 56 percent of the land.  This was followed by the British evacuation, proclamation of the State of Israel (which the U.S. immediately recognized), the First Arab-Israeli War and what Palestinians called the “Nakba,” or catastrophe.

The author’s father, Ismail Raghib al-Khalidi, who had spent the war in the USA, was sent by the newly-founded Arab-American Institute to enlist the support of the King of Jordan for the Palestinian cause.  But his uncle, the former mayor of Jerusalem, insisted that he tell the king that the Palestinians did not need Jordanian tutelage.

About 700,000 Palestinians fled or were driven out during the war.  Their property was taken over by the Israeli government to be used solely for the benefit of the Jewish people, and land they occupied was annexed to Israel.  Egypt and Jordan occupied the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, where many Palestinians settled. 

Chap. 3.  The Third Declaration of War, 1967.  In the Six-Day War, the State of Israel, with the Johnson administration’s approval, made preemptive strikes on Egypt, Jordan and Syria, and conquered the West Bank, Gaza Syria’s Golan Heights and (temporarily) Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula.  

The United Nations Security Council enacted Resolution 242, which in effect repealed the 1947 partition plan and recognized Israel’s right to the additional territories it conquered in 1948.  It also made Israel’s yielding of the newly conquered territories conditional on Israel having “secure borders.” 

The significance of the war was the emergence of the United States as openly a partner of Israel, Khalidi wrote, providing diplomatic cover for Israel’s conquests.  

At the time Khalidi’s father worked at the United States, and observed Arthur Goldberg, U.S. ambassador to the U.N., delay enactment of Resolution 242 in order to give Israel time to complete its conquest of the Golan Heights.   The author himself joined a protest demonstration in support of Palestine.  Exactly four people took part.

Chap. 4.  The Fourth Declaration of War, 1982.  With U.S. weapons and backing, Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 in order to root out the Palestine Liberation Organization, which was headquartered there.  Israel bombed residential areas indiscriminately, killing or wounding nearly 50,000 Palestinians and Lebanese.

When bombs started falling on Beirut, Khalidi was a professor at American University of Beirut and was an off-the-record source for foreign journalists.  His wife, Mona, was editor of the PLO’s English-language bulletin.  She was four months pregnant with their son, and their two daughters were in pre-school.

The PLO in August agreed to evacuate Lebanon, without specific guarantees to protect the Palestinian civilian population.  Almost immediately after, Israeli tanks and troops started rolling into Khalidi’s neighborhood.  He and his family were granted refuge at the university.

Soon after, an Israeli tank rolled up to the gates of the university, and an Israeli commander demanded the right to enter to search for terrorists.  Khalidi said that he, his wife and even their children were considered terrorists.  But Malcolm Kerr, the president of the university, denied entrance to the troops.

That night, Khalidi and his family observed flares over a Palestinian refugee camp.  They were set off by the Israeli army to facilitate a massacre of refugees by an allied Christian militia that had been admitted to the camps.

Chap. 5.  The Fifth Declaration of War, 1987-1995.  At long last, the focus of the Palestinian struggle shifted to the Holy Land itself.  Palestinians launched the First Intifada, a mass uprising against Israeli rule, using both peaceful and terrorist tactics.  

Khalidi said the Intifada did more damage to Israel’s power and prestige than anything that had gone before, but the negotiations that led to the 1993 Oslo accords were a great missed opportunity.  He served on an advisory committee to the PLO negotiators, but his advice was not heeded.

Israel agreed to recognize the PLO as the sole representative of the Palestinian people.  It gave the PLO responsibility for governing parts of the West Bank and Gaza.  In return, the PLO recognized Israel as a legitimate government and accepted responsibility for preventing terrorist attacks from the territory it controlled.

There was no agreement on Palestinian sovereignty, land and water a Palestinian right of return, limits of Israeli settlement on the West Bank and Gaza and an end date to Israel occupation.  All these issues were made a topic for future negotiations, which never took place.

Chap. 6.  The Sixth Declaration of War, 2000-2014.  Israel’s treatment of the PLO and the new Palestinian Authority was followed by the rise of Hamas and other militant organizations.  After a Hamas election victory, Israel exited Gaza, then subjected it to a partial blockage.  Hamas fired rockets into Israel.  Israel responded with attacks on Gaza in 2008, 2012 and 2014, using armed drones, Apache helicopters, war planes and heavy artillery.

Rashid Khalidi seems to have a kind of grudging respect for the Zionist movement, its unrelenting sense of purpose over decades and how it grew from a tiny group of zealots to an important force in world affairs.  

Zionists used all possible means to advance their cause, not just military conquest and covert action, but diplomacy, politics, economic pressure, philanthropy and, very importantly, appeals to world public opinion.  

Palestinians need to learn from their example, Khalidi wrote, and not just lash out blindly.  As of 2020, he said, the Boycott-Divest-Sanctions movement was doing more to advance the Palestinian cause than either Hamas or its rival Fatah.

They need to recognize that Arab governments are not necessarily their friends and that the U.S. government is their enemy.  This does not rule out appeals to public opinion in the United States or even in Israel.

He said attempts to create settler nations end in three ways.

  1. The full subjugation of the native population, as in North America.
  2. The defeat and expulsion of the colonizer, as in Algeria.
  3. The abandonment of colonizer supremacy, as in South Africa, Zimbabwe and Ireland. 

In the first instance, the settlers vastly outnumbered the natives.  In the second and third, the natives vastly outnumbered the settlers.  But Palestinians and Israelis are roughly equal in numbers.

Khalidi thinks the third option is the realistic option.  It would mean that Jews would have to abandon Zionism, which is the goal of a homogenous ethnic Jewish with exclusive rights to rule the Holy Land.  

But it also would mean that Palestinians would have to abandon the goal of driving out the Israelis.  Even though the State of Israel was established by illegitimate means, he wrote, the Israelis are not going to leave the Holy Land, any more than the Palestinians are.

The foundation of Israel’s power is its backing by the United States.  But neither the ability or the willingness of US Americans to support Israel will continue indefinitely, he wrote.  

He went on to write that the world is changing and “perhaps such changes will allow Palestinians, together with Israelis and others worldwide who wish for peace and stability with Palestine, to craft a different trajectory than than of oppression of one people by another.  Only such a path based on equality and justice is capable of concluding the hundred years’ war on Palestine with a lasting peace, one that brings the liberation that the Palestinian people deserve.”

Afterthought [01/28/2024].  Just to clarify what I think:

Prof. Khalidi’s book is not objective.  It is a lawyer’s brief, which downplays arguments and facts that support the other side, but it is a convincing brief.  He makes the case that Palestinian Arabs are the victims of a historic injustice, and that we US Americans need to understand that, but correcting that injustice may not be possible.

My wish is for a peace acceptable to both sides.  I don’t see any path to that peace.

One should not give up hope, but I can’t foresee any likely future for the Holy Land that does not involve more dead children and weeping women.  

I object to the U.S. government providing weapons, money and intelligence to enable the Israeli government to engage in mass killing of civilians, and I deny that I need to provide a solution to Israel’s security problem in order to have standing to make that objection.

I think a terrible retribution is coming, both for Israel and the United States, when countries we’ve targeted will have the power to do to us what we’ve been doing to them.  I don’t think committing more atrocities will stave off that retribution or make it any less dreadful.

LINKS

The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine by Rashid Khalidi review – conquest and resistance by Matthew Hughes for The Guardian.

The War on History by Benny Morris for the Jewish Review of Books.

Is There Any Way to End the Israel-Palestine Conflict? by Scott Anderson for The New York Times.

Tags: , , , , , ,

12 Responses to “A Palestinian history of Zionism and its wars”

  1. Anonymous Says:

    Thanks for posting this Phil. It’s important to correct the false narrative of Israel as the embattled victim fighting for survival against evil terrorists. If the world’s leaders cared as much about justice for Palestinians as the survival of Israel we might be a lot closer to a Palestinian state.

    Like

  2. Fred (Au Natural) Says:

    Israel is going to do what Israel is going to do and their only real opponents are the Iranian proxies. And they are only in it because Iran hates Israel and not for the good of the Palestinians. Even Hamas isn’t in it for the good of the Palestinians. Everything is performative.

    Like

  3. philebersole Says:

    This is from an email by an acquaintance of mine

    As a liberal of Jewish origins, I have followed events in Israel closely. What horrifies me is neither the Palestinian raid nor the Israeli response. Instead, as an American, I am VERY disturbed by the total lack of nuance from both sides of the issue. Pro-Israel folk ignore the many provocations that led to the recent attack. Pro-Palestinians ignore the fact that Israel was sure to inflict more damage on Gaza than they had done to Israel and ignore the horror of the terroristic attack.

    Like

    • philebersole Says:

      Sometimes you need to look at granular detail, but sometimes you need to step back and look at the broad pattern of events.

      In the broad pattern of events, I think the history of the State of Israel is a tragedy.

      Israel was founded to create a refuge for victims of anti-semitism, which, even aside from Nazism, was very real. It was the only haven for Jews in refugee camps after World War Two. It was natural for people of good will to support the Zionist project. I was one of those people.

      Today, 75 years later, we see that the Zionist ideology consists of 19th century blood-and-soil nationalism and settler colonialism, which are incompatible with liberal democracy as understood by most Americans and Europeans. Peace in Israel is impossible until Israelis abandon Zionism.

      I do not say this out of self-righteousness. What the Netanyahu government intends to do to the Palestinians is exactly what my white American forebears did to the American Indians. We liberals weep crocodile tears over what our forebears did and recite “land acknowledgements,” but none of us (myself included) proposes to give the land back.

      Israel is like what the United States would be if American Indians were subjugated as they are now, but were half the population of the USA.

      Like

    • philebersole Says:

      My acquaintance replied

      To me the key words in your letter are “Netanyahu government”. While they’ve prevailed for the last few years and have followed a brutally oppressive policy, it doesn’t follow from that that there has been “Hundred Years War on Palestine”. And there is still hope that a “two nation” solution might yet happen. Trump’s election (past and possibly future) doesn’t mean that our entire country hates immigrants.

      Like

  4. mosckerr Says:

    Biden faces a Presidential election in less than a Year’s time.  He’s doing horribly bad in the pre-election polling today.  The Gaza Abomination Oct 7th War, it compares to the Covid-19 mass epidemic which destroyed the 3 amazing years wherein under President Trump’s fabulous leadership the President Made America Great Again.

    I have worked in Gaza.  Plus, my moving company assisted Israelis out of Gaza, in compliance with PM Sharon’s leadership tremendous decision.  My moving trucks did not fly the orange ribbons of protest to PM Sharon’s unilateral decision.  I witnessed the horrors of looking down from the edge of the cliff of that near catastrophic Civil War which took Israelis to the brink of a Lebanese or Syrian total destruction of our young nation.

    Israel gave up all of Gaza to set up a Hong Kong model Island Palestinian State back in 2005.  We gave them the famous Gush Katif organic farms and several amazing milk farms (assets which i personally saw with my own eyes) which consisted of an engineered rotating slab of cement, which floated upon a thin layer of water, which permitted milk-cows to independently depart from their milk stations, and return back to their pens.  

    This revolutionary milking methodology permitted, in about the same time-period of milking, approximately double the amount of cows in the same time-period, as it took in the standard T-bone milking system set-up, used across the world by dairy farms.  These tremendous assets the Palestinians despised and immediately destroyed! 

    In the 2006 elections Hamas threw the PA, ie the Olso Accords out the window!  Between 2007 to 2024 Hamas has attacked Israel four times resulting in Wars.  The Hamas Charter calls for the total destruction of Israelis from the River to the Sea!  Now we Israelis no longer feel generous toward these dune-coon rag-headed dhimmi Arab refugee pigs.

    Like

  5. Walter Uhrman Says:

    With decolonialization and independence in 1948, newly formed nations accepted the fact that all they desired would not come to fruition. India was saddened that Jinnah, leader of the Kingsom of Pakistan, would not join the newly formed India; however, Gandhi and Neru agreed to accept an India without Pakistan. China, after the 1948 revolution unhappy that it would not have Formosa, also agreed to have a new liberated China absent a Formosa.
    Wars have consequences: With the defeat of the Ottoman Empire new boundaries did establish several new states, among them were Palestine and Israel. Israel similar to India and China wanted to have had complete control over their holy city of Jerusalem, yet they agreed to have Jerusalem as an international city. In general, whereas these newly formed nations accepted less than they originally wanted, Arabs, instead of agreeing to the United Nation Plan which would establish the nation of Palestine immediately declared war on Israel. The history of the last seventy-five years can be thought of in terms of Arabs/Palestinians desperately trying to erase an unbelievable act of colossal stupidity in rejecting the Partition Plan .
    The subject of refugees is complicated with disagreements among historians. In addition to direct expulsion orders by Israeli authorities, many Palestinians responded to the call from Arabs to leave; also, was the decision of thousands of wealthy Arabs to leave Israel in anticipation of war. After the war, and after the dust had settled, the U.N. Progress Report, September 1948, spoke about the refugee crisis, stating that probably no more than 672,000 could have been refugees. Yes, a vast number, but nowhere the number of refugees that the Arabs claim.
    Further, Jordan’s King Abdullah writing in his 1978 memories states, “…The tragedy of the Palestinians was that most of their leaders had paralyzed them with false and unsubstantiated promises that they were not alone; that 80 million Arabs and 400 million Muslims would instantly and miraculously come to their defense…”
    And lest we forget, Arab nations after 1948 expelled in the neighborhood 0f 590,00 Jews from their countries. No outcry at this injustice.
    In speaking about Israel, the companion term ‘occupation’ stands shoulder to shoulder with the Israelis . Let’s try be a little more expansive about the term ‘occupation’. After Israel’s 1948 War of Independence, Egypt and Jordan occupied the nation of Palestine from 1948 to 1968, with Egypt occupying Gaza and Jordan occupying the West Bank. And, during this twenty-year occupation there was absolutely not voice of protest from Arabs — or I might add other nations – about Egypt and Jordan’s illegal occupation of the nation of Palestine. Let’s be honest and say Arabs could not give a damn about the Palestinians. It was only after the 1968 war when Israel defended itself against the Arab’s quest to exterminate them, that Israel in defending themselves took over Gaza and the West Bank. Then — and only then — was a loud chorus from the hypocritical Arabs about the plight of the poor Palestinos.
    Israel has tried and tried subsequent to 1948 to extend gestures of peace to Palestine, only to be rebuffed at each attempt. A few examples: In 1979 Israel-Egypt peace negotiations offered Palestinians autonomy which could have led to independence; and, in 1982 Israel returns Sinai to Egypt as an overture to peace. Can anyone name one other country surrendering half its territory to help start a basis for peace?
    Unfortunately, 1990 Oslo agreements, after signing, led to another episode of terrorism. In 1995 Simon Perez, who was running to be Prime Minister with Labor, stated if elected with Labor Party, the West Bank will be returned to the Palestinians, only to be met the next day by continued terrorism and bombings throughout Jerusalem. Again, 2000 Prime Minister Ehud Barak offer to create a Palestinian state in all of Gaza and 97 percent of the West Bank.
    None of these gestures were 100%; yet they were a foundation to start a process. It is the height of naïve thinking to expect perfection during round one. In the United States during the 1930’s, this nation passed the Social Security Act. Was the original Social Act perfect during its initial passage? Absolutely not as did not include Afro-Americans, but it was a start. All agreements begin with ‘road-map ‘so to speak’ for improvement and continuation. Regrettably, many Arabs with hatred in the center of their thinking towards Israel can’t entertain this thought.
    Today decades of simmering frustrations surrounding Israelis must be factored in to understand today’s horror.

    Like

  6. philebersole Says:

    Walter, I agree that the history of the Holy Land is complex. I can see why Jewish people would want a land of their own that would serve as a refuge for victims of persecution and anti-semitism, especially for the Jewish displaced persons after World War Two. And why they would put their own needs ahead of the rights of the people already occupying the land.

    I also agree with your comments about the hypocrisy of the Arab governments. So long as Israel’s conflict was primarily with the Arab governments, my sympathies were with Israel.

    For what it’s worth, I think the turning point came in 1967. Many writers at the time thought that the rank-and-file Palestinian Arabs were willing to accept defeat and make the best of their lives on the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza. However, they were not allowed to do that. Settlers immediately and continually moved into the lands allotted to the Palestinians, much like U.S. settlers in the 19th moved into the lands allotted to the Indians. A process began of pushing the Palestinians out of what little was left to them. Palestinians were offered land for peace, but they didn’t get peace.

    Of course I disapprove of the high-profile terrorist acts by the PLO, Islamic Jihad, Hamas, etc. But the IDF and Mossad have a higher body count.

    The bottom line is that claims of historic injustice are never justifications for mass killing. The Israeli government is waging a war of extermination against the people of Gaza. Many more people have been killed than in the official reports, because they only count people who died in hospitals, not those buried under the rubble. But these are a small number compared to those who will die as a result of the cutoff of food, water and medical supplies.

    Yes, the history is complicated. But when it comes to mass killing of civilians, the issue is clear.

    Like

  7. mosckerr Says:

    Proof that the South African genocide case heard before the corrupt UN court – complete and utter bull shit.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghur_genocide

    The Chinese government has committed a series of ongoing human rights abuses against Uyghurs and other ethnic and religious minorities in Xinjiang that is often characterized as genocide. Beginning in 2014, the Chinese government, under the administration of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) General Secretary Xi Jinping, incarcerated more than an estimated one million Turkic Muslims without any legal process in internment camps.

    Operations from 2016 to 2021 were led by Xinjiang CCP Secretary Chen Quanguo. It is the largest-scale detention of ethnic and religious minorities since World War II. The Chinese government began to wind down the camps in 2019. Amnesty International states that detainees have been increasingly transferred to the formal penal system.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.