The Basilisk by Paul Kingsnorth for emergence magazine.
Posts Tagged ‘Internet addiction’
A short story of the haunted Internet
August 9, 2020Connected but disembodied
August 14, 2012I’m 75, and don’t have much contact with young people, but friends of mine who teach in college and public schools constantly complain about how their students are wedded to their i-Phones and other electronic devices, and are more engrossed in their text messages than in what the teacher has to say.
Sherry Turkle, in her TED talk shown above, said this is an example of how technology is changing how we relate to the world. Her idea is that people nowadays don’t want to be alone, so they keep in touch with friends constantly by text messaging and e-mail; on the other hand, they don’t want to be too up close and personal, so text messaging and e-mail also keep people at a distance. So, she said, our technology keeps us connected but alone. There’s something to this, but how new is it? I can remember the pre-electronic era when the great complaint about teenagers was that they were always on the telephone.
Electronic communications media are great for introverts. I’m an introvert myself. I grew up before the age of electronic communication, but I’m addicted to print. I’ve gotten a lot out of a lifetime of reading, but I recognize that to some extent, it has been a substitute for mixing with people. One reason I became a newspaper reporter instead of an academic was to counteract this tendency in myself. We should not attribute to technologies that which is a reflection of our personalities.
As I see it, electronic technologies do not disconnect us from other people so much as they disconnect us from physical reality. We speak of “virtual reality” as if it were an alternative to real reality; we speak of cyberspace as if it were an alternative to so-called “meat space”. But we are physical beings, not disembodied minds. In the virtual reality of the Internet and the electronic media, we can pretend that the world is what the postmodern philosophers say it is, a purely mental construct of our own creation. But there is a real reality that will catch up with us, whether we believe in it or not.
I find electronic communications technology highly useful and highly addictive. I don’t own a cell phone, I don’t have a Facebook page and I don’t Tweet or Twitter, but I check my e-mail several times a day and I post on this blog almost every day, and I feel deprived if my e-mail or Internet service is unavailable for any reason. Interacting with the Internet is a form of operant conditioning. I press a key and (usually) get a stimulus. Our human brains are hard-wired to like stimulus.
Then, too, the Internet, like books, offers a form of escape. I know people who spend hours a day interacting with the World of Warcraft, which in many ways is more appealing than the actual world. In the World of Warcraft, ingenuity and hard work pay off, and no mistake or bad luck is ever irrevocable.
Click on The Acceleration of Addictiveness for Paul Graham’s classic essay on Internet addiction.
Click on Dead Souls for Dimitry Orlov’s classic essay on virtual reality as a substitute for real reality.
Kicking the Internet habit
September 22, 2011When I worked for newspapers, I often would get home from work late at night, flop down on my sofa and start flipping through TV channels. Even when I didn’t find anything I liked, I would sit in a mindless stupor and keep on going through the channels. The next morning I would wake up tired and wonder why I wasted my time this way.
Nowadays I hardly ever watch television, and I only subscribe to the Basic cable service. But sometimes I duplicate this mindlessly addictive pattern in my Internet use. I go mindlessly flipping through different web logs, even though I’m not looking for anything in particular and don’t find any new or interesting information.
Scientific research indicates that just as people and animals can become conditioned to seek pleasure, they can be conditioned to seek novelty. Other research indicates that the most effective form of conditioning is random reinforcement. You keep trying even when there is no reward because (as the New York Lottery ads say) hey, you never know.
I enjoy writing on this web log, and am pleased that there are people who find it interesting, but sometimes it becomes an obsession, too, taking away more than is good from the rest of my life. My reward is the number of page views. I am conditioned, I supposed, to seek approval, even the approval of people I don’t know and will never meet.
I don’t want to make too much of this, but I am reminded of the devil Screwtape in C.S. Lewis’s The Screwtape Letters, who tells his nephew that the most elegant form of damnation is to lure the subject away from doing what he ought to do to something that does not even give him real pleasure.
The on-line cartoonist “xkcd” posted ideas on how to break out of this conditioning.
I made it a rule that as soon as I finished any task, or got bored with it, I had to power off my computer.
I could turn it back on right away—this wasn’t about trying to use the computer less. The rule was just that the moment I finished (or lost interest in) the thing I was doing, and felt like checking Google News et. al., before I had time to think too much, I’d start the shutdown process. There was no struggle of willpower; I knew that after I hit the button, I could decide to do anything I wanted. But if I decided to look at a website, I’d have to wait through the startup, and once I was done, I’d have to turn it off again before doing anything else. … … …
There’s some interesting research about novelty and dopamine, suggesting (tentatively) that for some people exposure to novelty may activate the same reward system that drug abuse does. In my case, I felt like my problem was that whenever I was trying to focus on a (rewarding) project, these sites were always in the background offering a quicker and easier rush. I’d sit down to write code, draw something, build something, or clean, and the moment I hit a little bump—math I wasn’t sure how to handle, a sentence I couldn’t word right, an electronic part I couldn’t find, or a sock without a mate—I’d find myself switching to one of these sites and refreshing.
Reward was briefly unavailable from the project, but constantly available from the internet. Adding the time-delay removed the promise of instant novelty, and perhaps helped disconnect the action from the reward in my head. Without that connection dominating my decisions, I could think more clearly about whether the task was really important to me. … …
It was remarkable how quickly the urges to constantly check those sites vanished. Also remarkable was that for the first time in years, I was keeping my room clean. Since the computer was no longer an instant novelty dispenser, when I got antsy or bored I’d look around my room for a distraction, and wind up picking up a random object and putting it away.
Click on Distraction Affliction Correction Extension for the full post.
Click on Resist Virtual Reality Addiction for the thoughts of young “Frost” on his Freedom Twenty-Five web log.
Click on How to Read for more of Frost’s ideas. I don’t follow any of these suggestions myself, but that doesn’t mean they’re not good.
Click on The Acceleration of Addictiveness for the thoughts of entrepreneur-essayist Paul Graham.